Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Board of Appeals of Holden

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 6, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

In January, 1974, the Holden housing authority (authority) obtained a comprehensive permit under G. L. c. 40B, § 21, from the Holden board of appeals (board) for the construction of low-cost housing for the elderly on a five-acre site, of which the Baileys own about three and one-half acres. 3 The Baileys appealed under G. L. c. 40B, § 21, to the Superior Court and now appeal from a final decree, entered in May, 1974, upholding the board’s action and dismissing the Baileys’ appeal. We transferred the appeal here on our own motion.

The Baileys argue that (1) the authority was required to hold a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Board of Appeals of Hanover v. Housing Appeals Comm.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Hayeck v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boston Preservation Alliance, Inc. v. Secretary of Environmental AffairsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Newburyport Redevelopment Authority v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. Armknecht v. Concord Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API