Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Webber Hicks

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2013No. 2012AP1947-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. The Office Lawyer Regulation (OLR) has filed a complaint and motion pursuant to SCR 22.221 asking this court to impose reciprocal discipline against Attorney Lisa A. Webber Hicks iden*267tical to the public censure imposed by the Supreme Court of Tennessee. The OLR's complaint further alleges that Attorney Webber Hicks failed to notify the OLR of the public censure in Tennessee within 20 days of the effective date of its imposition, contrary to SCR 22.22(1).

¶ 2. On November 14, 2012, in response to the OLR's motion, this court issued an amended order directing Attorney Webber Hicks to show…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Adam A. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Adam A. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel O. BarhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API