Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel O. Barham

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2025No. 2025AP002010-DPublished

1Opinion of the Court

2025 WI 54

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST DANIEL O. BARHAM, ATTORNEY AT LAW OFFICE OF LAWYER REGULATION, Complainant, v. DANIEL O. BARHAM, Respondent. No. 2025AP2010-D Decided December 11, 2025 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ¶1 PER CURIAM. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Daniel O. Barham filed a stipulation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.12, requesting the court to publicly reprimand Attorney Barham as discipline reciprocal to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Tennessee’s Board of Professional Responsibility. They also request that the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Webber HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API