Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hicks

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 2012No. 2011AP2736-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. In this disciplinary proceeding, we consider whether to impose discipline on Attorney Lisa A. Webber Hicks reciprocal to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Tennessee or its disciplinary agency. As Attorney Webber Hicks has not alleged that any exception to reciprocal discipline in SCR 22.22(3)1 applies, we impose both a public reprimand and a four-year suspension of Attorney Webber Hicks' license to practice law in Wisconsin as reciprocal discipline. We also require Attorney Webber Hicks to comply with a monitoring agreement mandated by the Supreme Court of Tennessee. Because it has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eichhorn-HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against NickitasWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Webber HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Cole J. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API