Legal Opinion
Shelly v. Brunswick Traction Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 4, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by •
Gíabeetso:n, J.
The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant for personal injuries received by him, by reason of his wagon being run into from the rear by a trolley ear of the defendant as he was driving on the tracks of the company in the evening, and a reversal of that judgment is sought, upon the grounds that the trial justice refused to direct a verdict for the defendant, excluded legal testimony and erred in charging the jury.
There was no motion to nonsuit, and it is necessary to consider all the testimony bearing upon the question of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Warner v. . the New York Cen. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Thompson v. BowieSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Williams v. EdmundsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Camden, Gloucester & Woodbury Railway Co. v. PrestonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Jackson ex dem. Norris v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1827
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hartman v. City of BrigantineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Reaves v. MandellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- George W. Eschelbach v. William S. Scull Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- George W. Eschelbach v. William S. Scull Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.