Legal Opinion

Williams v. Edmunds

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1889PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Cash. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The defendant is the proprietor of a livery stable in the city of Detroit.

*93On the twenty-fourth day of December, 1886, one of his carriages, driven by Daniel Sullivan, an employé, ran over the plaintiff at a street crossing at the corner of the Campus Martius and Monroe avenue, severely injuring her.

The substantial ground of complaint in the plaintiff’s declaration was that the defendant, by his servant Sullivan, so carelessly, rapidly, and improperly drove, governed, and directed his carriage and horses, that by and through the carelessness, negligence, and improper conduct of the defendant,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fahey v. CrottyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McCarty v. LearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gleason v. LoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Langworthy v. Township of GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Krouse v. Southern Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. People v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Towle v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API