Legal Opinion

Camden, Gloucester & Woodbury Railway Co. v. Preston

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On error to the Gloucester Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dayton, J.

Suit was brought by Cornelius Preston, administrator of Charles C. Purton, to recover damages for the loss which the latter’s widow and orphans sustained by his death. A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff below, and the case is brought into this court upon exceptions to the charge of the judge presiding at the trial.

*265It appeared by the evidence that the deceased was driving in an open pony wagon, after dark, from Camden to Wood-bury, on the line of the electric railway. At a point on Broadway, near the Newton creek bridge, a car, coming in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lafayette & Indianapolis Railroad v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tabor v. O'GRADYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Tabor v. O'GRADYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Shelly v. Brunswick Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  4. Houston v. Delaware, L. & W. R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
  5. Lehigh Valley R. v. StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API