Legal Opinion

Grindle v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided August 27, 2013No. 2012-KA-00006-COAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. The hearsay exception for dying declarations is so firmly rooted in our common law that it was incorporated as a historical exception to the Sixth Amendment right to confront one’s accuser. This long-recognized evidentiary exception’s interplay with the Confrontation Clause is front and center in Brandon Grindle’s appeal of his deliberate-design murder conviction. On appeal, Grindle challenges the trial judge’s decision that the shooting victim’s nonverbal responses to a police officer’s questions about who shot him, made immediately before his death, were…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. People v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 2004

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harold Bishop v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Southern Health Corporation of Houston, Inc. v. Carol CrausbyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  3. State v. HailesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Moss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  5. Vernell Daven Miskell v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API