Grindle v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MAXWELL, J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. The hearsay exception for dying declarations is so firmly rooted in our common law that it was incorporated as a historical exception to the Sixth Amendment right to confront one’s accuser. This long-recognized evidentiary exception’s interplay with the Confrontation Clause is front and center in Brandon Grindle’s appeal of his deliberate-design murder conviction. On appeal, Grindle challenges the trial judge’s decision that the shooting victim’s nonverbal responses to a police officer’s questions about who shot him, made immediately before his death, were…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- People v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harold Bishop v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Southern Health Corporation of Houston, Inc. v. Carol CrausbyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
- State v. HailesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Moss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
- Vernell Daven Miskell v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.