Legal Opinion

Braxton v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 13, 1984PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIE, Justice:

In this case the Court must decide what remedy is available to a criminal defendant whose attorney was given a timely instruction to file an appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court but failed to do so in violation of his duties under Rule 26(a).

The defendant, Wilbert T. Braxton, Jr., was convicted, after a jury trial, of rape second degree and possession of a deadly weapon during the commission of a felony. He was sentenced on April 30, 1982 to ten years of imprisonment, five years of which was a mandatory minimum term under the provisions of 11 Del.C. § 1447(b) before it was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MirandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Curran v. WoolleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  3. Fisher v. BiggsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  4. Erb v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  5. Poe v. PoeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  2. MacDonald v. DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  3. Eller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  4. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  5. Middlebrook v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API