Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Delaware

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 27, 2001No. 220, 2000PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice.

In this appeal from the Superior Court’s denial of a motion for postconviction relief, the appellant contends that he should have been permitted to withdraw guilty pleas that he claims he entered into without the effective assistance of counsel and under conditions of duress. Upon a full review of the record, we conclude that, given the irregularities in the process leading up to the entry of the guilty pleas — including the consent of the defendant’s counsel to changing the conditions of the defendant’s confinement — the disputed guilty pleas were neither intelligently nor…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Albury v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Garden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. Milton S. Hershey Medical Center v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  4. MacDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  5. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API