Legal Opinion

Block v. Love

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This suit was filed September 25, 1929, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. It is admitted that plaintiff is and was legally engaged in the plumbing business under the assumed name of Alberta Plumbing Company, in Portland, Oregon; that he performed labor and furnished materials as an original contractor on a building known as 454 Buffalo street, Portland, on lot 18, block 5, El Tovar, an addition in and to the city of Portland; that his contract was for the complete installation of all the plumbing in said building for the sum of $320.50; that he began work on his contract previous to the eighth…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. James A. C. Tait & Co. v. StrykerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Trullinger v. KofoedOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Eastern & Western Lumber Co. v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Anderson v. GriffithOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Stark-Davis Co. v. FellowsOregon Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Shea v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Fatland v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. TRI-CITY BUILDING CENTER, INC. v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Bradfield v. BollierOregon Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API