Legal Opinion

Bradfield v. Bollier

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, C. J.

On the 11th day of July 1938, the original plaintiff herein, Fred E. Roberts, and defendant, E. Beatrice Bollier, also known as Ethel B. Bollier, entered into a contract that was partly written and partly oral, the written portion of which is as follows:

“This Agreement, Made this 11th day of July, 1938, by and between

Fred E. Roberts, hereinafter referred to as ‘Builder’, and Ethel B. Bollier, hereinafter referred to as ‘Owner’. Witnesseth:

That for the consideration of the payments hereinafter provided, the Builder agrees to construct completely, as hereinafter provided, a house on Lots 7 and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tribou & McPhee v. StrowbridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Pearson v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. James A. C. Tait & Co. v. StrykerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. O. C. Gove & Co. v. Island City Mercantile & Milling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Easton v. QuackenbushOregon Supreme Court · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trachsel v. BarneyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Gabriel v. CorkumOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gillis v. GilletteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Pacific Engineering Corp. v. Evans Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API