Legal Opinion

United States v. Henderson

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 26, 2004No. 03-0470/NAPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*351Judge ERDMANN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant Damage Controlman Fireman Apprentice (DCFA) Michael J. Henderson was charged with making a false official statement, willful damage to military property, willfully hazarding a vessel, wrongfully using marijuana, larceny of military property, and wrongful appropriation, in violation of Articles 107, 108, 110, 112a, and 121 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 907-908, 910, 912a, and 921 (2000), respectively. The only charge at issue in this appeal is “willfully hazarding a vessel” in violation of Article 110.

Hende…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MelansonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. WilkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. JeterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. BancroftUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. KohutCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  3. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  4. United States v. NealyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  5. United States v. AverellNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API