Legal Opinion

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 14, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-1539Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-01539 (CJN) THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Under the Poultry Products Inspection Act,

21 U.S.C. §§ 451

et seq., the Department of Agriculture must prevent sellers of certain poultry products from misleading customers. The Animal Legal Defense Fund asserts that the packaging of certain poultry products is misleading, and therefore claims that the Department is violating both the Inspection Act…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API