Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Yaris v. Shaughnessy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 28, 1953PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

These are two habeas -corpus proceedings in which the relators allege ill treatment in -their former place of detention and illegality of their present place of detention. The relators are aliens presently held pending deportation proceedings, at the Federal Detention Headquarters in New York City which serves as the common jail for federal offenders. They have been charged in those proceedings, among other things, with membership in the Communist Party. In these habeas corpus proceedings they do not raise any question as to the deportation proceedings or the denial of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. MedleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Dowd v. United States Ex Rel. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Cochran v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Sweeney v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lawrence William Wright v. Daniel McMann as Warden of Clinton State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. Duncan v. UlmerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
  3. Fernandez v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1980
  4. Nichols v. McGeeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959
  5. Hazel Palmer v. Allen C. Thompson, Mayor, City of JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API