Legal Opinion

In Re Miranda

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided November 26, 2001No. 14-31275PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING CHASE MANHATTAN BANK’S MOTION TO ALLOW LATE FILING OF PROOF OF CLAIM (doc #48)

WESLEY W. STEEN, Bankruptcy Judge.

These findings and conclusions are issued in a frustrating procedural context. Notwithstanding the fact that no party has objected or requested a hearing, the Court denies Chase’s Motion to Allow Late Filing of Proof of Claim (docket # 48, the “Motion”) because the Court does not have authority to grant that relief in a chapter 13 case. These findings and conclusions attempt to explain the reasons for, and the limitations of, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WaindelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. In Re MooreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
  3. Internal Revenue Service v. HildebrandDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2000

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re WindomUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2002
  2. Tepper v. Burnham (In Re Tepper)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
  3. Graham v. Hudson (In Re Graham)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003
  4. In Re BloebaumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2004
  5. In Re NamusyuleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API