Legal Opinion

Berka v. City of Middletown

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 17, 2018No. AC39579PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed the self-represented plaintiff's administrative appeal on the ground that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to the plaintiff's failure to name the state of Connecticut Department of Public Health (department) as a party in his administrative citation. On appeal, the self-represented plaintiff, George Berka, claims first that the department acted improperly by not informing him that it needed to be named as a party and, second, that the trial court's dismissal of his appeal deprived him of due process. We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tolly v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Village Creek Homeowners Assn. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Donis v. Connecticut Board of Examiners in PodiatrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Bittle v. Commissioner of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Shapiro v. CarothersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. Dept. of Developmental ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. Berka v. City of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API