Legal Opinion

Carstens Packing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Division of the Industrial Accident Board

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1943No. 7114PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AILSHIE, J.-

This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Accident Board and comes here for consideration under the provisions of the italicized proviso to sec. 18-5, chap. 182, 1941 Session Laws, which chapter is an amendment to chap. 239 of the 1939 Session Laws (p. 563, at 577). Subdivision (f) of sec. 18-5 of the 1939 Act, defines “covered employment” and contains only the following words, “-^Agricultural labor.” Subdivision (f) of the corresponding chapter and section of the 1941 Session Laws, reads as follows:

“ (f) Services performed in the employ of an individual owner or tenant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Batt v. Unemployment Compensation Division of Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Big Wood Canal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Division of Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Carstens Packing Co. v. Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Twin Falls County v. Idaho Commission on RedistrictingIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Heller v. International Transport, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In Re Liability of BattIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Chester B. Brown Co. v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Link's School of Business, Inc. v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API