Legal Opinion

Casper v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1938No. Appeal, 21PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This appeal, taken and prosecuted by the insurance carrier for the employer of the claimant, is from a judgment entered upon an award for additional compensation, to begin January 14, 1936, and continue, within the limitations of our Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, 77 PS §1 et seq., and its amendments, until claimant’s disability ceases or changes. As the judgment is based upon a misinterpretation of section 306, 77 PS §§511-513, and section 413, 77 PS §§771-772, as construed by our Supreme Court and by this court, it must be reversed. Aside…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Zupicick v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Clark v. Clearfield Opera House Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Gardner v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Kitchen v. Miller Bros. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Killian v. Heintz Div. Kelsey HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Yanik v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Croll v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. McCall v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Hayden v. Stony Spring Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API