Legal Opinion
BJB ELECTRIC LP v. BRIDGELUX, INC.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 16, 2023No. 3:22-cv-01886Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BJB ELECTRIC LP, 10 Case No. 22-cv-01886-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER REGARDING THE 12 ADMISSIBILITY OF PAROL BRIDGELUX, INC., EVIDENCE 13 Defendant. 14 15 Supplemental briefing regarding what parol evidence rules govern in this contract dispute 16 reveals—it turns out—substantial agreement between the parties. BJB Electric LP and Bridgelux, 17 Inc. agree course of dealing, usage of trade, and course of performance evidence is admissible to 18 explain or supplement the terms of the Letter Agreement. Further, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sicor Ltd. v. Cetus Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Morey v. VannucciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Brinderson-Newberg Joint Venture v. Pacific Erectors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Republic Bank v. Marine National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.