Cullen v. Dawson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This was an appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Eamsey county, Simons, J., presiding, denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
This is an interpleader action commenced by the plaintiffs on March 25, 1876.
In the complaint the plaintiffs set out an agreement, (hereinafter recited,) executed and delivered by them to Lyman C. Dayton, admit the receipt of the money therein referred to, and allege their willingness to pay the sum mentioned in the agreement as soon as it, can be determined who is rightfully *68entitled to the same. The complaint further alleges that defendants Dawson & Co. claim to be the owners and holders of the agreement, and have commenced an action to recover the money mentioned therein; that Simonton, as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- President, Directors & Co. of the City Bank v. BangsNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Yates v. TisdaleNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
3Cited by6 opinions
- North Pacific Lumber Co. v. LangOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Hoyt v. GougeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Austin v. MarchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Equitable Life Insurance v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Deones v. ZechesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.