Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Insurance v. Johnston

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 1935No. 42968PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Herbert T. Johnston had a policy with the plaintiff company in the amount of $10,000, providing for the payment of said amount upon his death, to Pearl D. Johnston, his wife, if she survived him, otherwise to his sons, Raymond Johnston and Rupert T. Johnston. Said policy contained a provision for double indemnity in case of accidental death. Attached to the policy and made a part thereof, was what was known as a “direction for settlement”, in which the insured directed that if his wife survived him the proceeds of the policy should be held by the company and the interest income thereon should…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Barry v. . Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Groves v. SentellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Crane v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Seth Spring & Sons v. South Carolina InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1823

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. C.F. Sales, Inc. v. Amfert, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  2. Rice v. Sioux City Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. BurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. KeganDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938
  5. Miller v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API