Legal Opinion

People v. Puluc-Sique

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 2010No. A123451PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEEDHAM, J.

An appellate court possesses the inherent power to dismiss the appeal of a criminal defendant who is a fugitive from justice. In this case, the People ask us to extend the appellate disentitlement doctrine to a defendant who has been deported from this country by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). We conclude that absent additional circumstances not presented here, a defendant who has been deported does not stand in the same shoes as one who has voluntarily placed himself beyond the court’s control. We therefore deny the motion to dismiss the appeal.

I.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. Campos-SerranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. People v. VillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Tehama County Department of Social Services v. L.K.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Hofer v. HoferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Stoltenberg v. Ampton Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. San Francisco Unified School District ex rel. Contreras v. First Student, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API