Legal Opinion

Stoltenberg v. Ampton Investments, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 2013No. B235731PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, Acting P. J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendants, an individual and a corporation, appealed from a California judgment in favor of plaintiffs, but did not post a bond to stay enforcement of the judgment. Plaintiffs, after registering the judgment in New York where defendants are located, attempted to enforce the registered sister state judgment there by serving a subpoena seeking financial information from the corporate defendant. Defendants did not comply with the subpoena or with a New York trial court order compelling them to respond to it. As a result, the New York trial court held…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. John L. Broadway v. City of Montgomery, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Sally Conforte v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph Conforte v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United Grand Corp. v. Malibu Hillbillies, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Gwartz v. WeilertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Blumberg v. MinthorneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Angel Lynn Realty, Inc. v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Blumberg v. MinthorneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API