Legal Opinion
Boykin v. Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 19, 1995No. 4:CV-94-306PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
This order relates to a motion for sanctions against Robert S. Mirin, counsel for the Plaintiffs, filed by Defendants Press-Enterprise, Inc. and Paul Eyerly, III, publisher of Press-Enterprise (“media defendants”).
A hearing on the motion commenced Friday, October 21, 1994. Mr. Mirin was the sole witness that entire day. During the day the Court stated that Mr. Mirin’s answers were extremely lengthy, that the proceedings were moving slowly, and that if the hearing was not terminated by 4:15 p.m. on the 6th hearing day, the Court would terminate it at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Alvaro Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc. And Playskool Baby, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Dennis Hackman v. Valley Fair and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of American, Local 575Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Doe v. Pennsylvania Blue ShieldDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Henke v. ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEMDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Alphonso v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Loftus v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Boykin v. Bloomsburg University of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.