Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided April 23, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01643Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SUE HARMON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:23-CV-1643-NJR LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Sue Harmon (“Harmon”) bought a smart clock manufactured by Defendant Lenovo (United States) Inc. (“Lenovo”), and filed this class action lawsuit when the clock allegedly did not work as advertised. (Doc. 1). Lenovo has moved to dismiss the Class Action Complaint for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 11). Harmon…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Dan Richards v. Michael MitcheffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Clarisha Benson v. Fannie May Confections BrandsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Holly Vanzant v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, IncorpoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. De Bouse v. Bayer AGIllinois Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API