Legal Opinion

De Bouse v. Bayer AG

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2009No. 107528PublishedCited by 169 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garman

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Kilbride concurred in part and dissented in part, with opinion.

OPINION

Plaintiff brought a claim under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Consumer Fraud Act or Act) (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 2004)). She alleges that the defendant drug manufacturer deceived the medical community and the public at-large by concealing information about negative side effects of the defendant’s cholesterol-lowering drug. In this case, we are asked to review three…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Oliveira v. Amoco Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Zekman v. Direct American Marketers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by169 opinions

  1. Sabrina Roppo v. Travelers Commercial InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Community Bank of Trenton v. Schnuck Markets, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Dino Rikos v. The Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  5. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API