National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma v. Unocal, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART UNOCAL’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING; LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION; FAILURE TO JOIN A PARTY UNDER RULE 19; AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED
PAEZ, District Judge.
I
Introduction
Plaintiffs, John Doe I, II, III, and IV, the Federation of Trade Unions of Burma (“FTUB”) on behalf of itself, its affiliate unions, its injured members and the injured members of its affiliates, and the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma (“NCGUB”), on behalf of the Union of Burma and the citizens of the Union of…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Ricotta v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1998
- Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLC.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Mehinovic v. VuckovicDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.