Legal Opinion

State v. . Mitchem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1924PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

There is no valid exception appearing on the record in this case.

The defendant complains at the action of the trial court in permitting one of the State’s witnesses to use a photograph of the premises, where the homicide occurred, in explaining his testimony. It was in evidence that the photograph correctly represented the scene of the killing. The court expressly refused to permit the photograph to be introduced in evidence, but allowed the witness to use it in illustrating his testimony. The evidence as to the correctness of the photograph was sufficient to render it competent for the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. Sultan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Hampton v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. State v. . OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. State v. . CraigeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. State v. . FrizellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API