Legal Opinion

Larrabee v. Selby

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1877No. 5570PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Seventeenth Judicial District, County of Los Angeles. The plaintiff, on the 20th day of December, 1872,- obtained judgment against the defendant, in an action of ejectment, for the recovery of the possession of. a tract of public land, described as the southwest one-quarter of section seventeen, township two south, range thirteen west, San Bernardino meridian, and the defendant was removed from the premises under the judgment..

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court, Seventeenth Judicial District, County of Los Angeles. The plaintiff, on the 20th day of December, 1872,- obtained judgment against the defendant, in an action of ejectment, for the recovery of the possession of. a tract of public land, described as the southwest one-quarter of section seventeen, township two south, range thirteen west, San Bernardino meridian, and the defendant was removed from the premises under the judgment.. The defendant afterwards re-entered, and this was a proceeding to punish him for a contempt of Court in doing so. Sec. 1210 of the Code…

1Opinion of the Court

An appeal lies to this Court. (Ware v. Robinson, 9 Cal. 107; Ex parte Rowe, 7 Cal. 175 ; Mahoney v. Van Winkle, 33 Cal. 448.) Defendant entered in good faith, having the right to enter under a subsequently acquired title, and not intending or committing contempt of Court. (Mahoney v. Van Winkle, ■ 33 Cal. 458.)

R. M. Widney, for the Respondent.

“ The judgment and orders of the. Court or Judge made in cases of contempt are final and conclusive.” (Code of Civil Procedure, sec. 1222.) “ An order of Court adjudging a party guilty of contempt is not appealable.” (Aram v. Shallenberger, 42 Cal. 275°)

B…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Mahoney v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Ware v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex parte HollisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Ex parte CaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Groves v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Tyler v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Carr v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API