Ware v. Robinson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco. The facts of this case appear in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
J., .concurring.
The plaintiffs commenced their action, upon a promissory note, against Swedenstierna, in the Superior Court of San Francisco. The summons was returned, without sei’vice, and the attoi’ney of the plaintiffs made affidavit that he was informed and believed that Swedenstierna was then in the State, and concealed himself to avoid the sei’vice of process. The Court, thereupon, made an *111order appointing an attorney to appear for Swedenstierna. The attorney appeared, and put in a general denial; and judgment was rendered for plaintiffs. Upon this judgment execution was issued, and the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- State v. SchneiderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Caro v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1883
- Larrabee v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Cradduck v. Financial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.