Legal Opinion

Buffat v. Schnuckle

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1957No. 8572Published

1Opinion of the Court

316 P.2d 887 (1957)

Jack BUFFAT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Harold D. SCHNUCKLE, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 8572.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

October 15, 1957.

Anderson & Anderson, Pocatello, Gilbert St. Clair, Idaho Falls, for appellant.

Merrill & Merrill, Pocatello, for respondent.

SMITH, Justice.

Appellant brought this action to recover damages on account of personal injuries received in an automobile accident which occurred while riding in an automobile driven by respondent.

The pleadings and appellant's evidence present the question whether at the time of the accident appellant was a passenger or whether…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API