Legal Opinion
Graham S Henry v. Charles Ryan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 8, 2014No. 09-99007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Supreme Court has stated that “finality and comity concerns, based in principles of federalism, demand that federal courts accord the appropriate level of respect to state judgments.” Ryan v. Schad, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 2548, 2551, 186 L.Ed.2d 644 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). In this case, finality is long overdue.
The panel issued its opinion in June 2013. It then proceeded to give Henry two extensions of time in which to file petitions for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. Upon finally receiving the petitions, ordering a response, and allowing ample time for their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bell v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Graham S Henry v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- State v. MedranoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- James McKinney v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Nancy MagenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Graham S Henry v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Graham S Henry v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014