Legal Opinion · Dissent

Graham S Henry v. Charles Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 4, 2014No. 09-99007Published

1Dissent

Judge TALLMAN, with whom Judges O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, BEA, and IKUTA join,

dissenting from the grant of rehearing en banc:

If one is remembered for the rules one breaks, then our court must be unforgettable. By taking this capital habeas case en banc now — after certiorari has been denied by the Supreme Court and well after the deadline for en banc review by our court has passed — we violate the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and our own General Orders. We also ignore recent Supreme Court authority that has reversed us for doing the same thing in the past. No circuit is as routinely…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Gary Bryant v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Bell v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API