Legal Opinion

Slocum v. O'Day

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. M. F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The circuit court of Cook county sustained demurrers to appellants’ amended bill in this case and dismissed it. The facts appearing from the amended bill and admitted by the demurrers are as follows: Prank C. O’Day, one of the defendants, entered into separate written contracts with three of the other defendants to sell each of them a different lot in block 2, in Harnstrom’s addition to Oak Park, Cook county, Illinois, in section 17, township 39, range 13, east of the third principal meridian. One of these contracts was with Tillie Hofwald for the conveyance of lot 38, and she gave as part of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Citizens' National Bank v. DaytonIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Rich v. Trustees of SchoolsIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Rodgers v. KavanaughIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Bowen v. GallowayIllinois Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. HelmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Wiseman v. WattersTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Harms v. CoryellIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Leeser v. KibortAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  5. Carpenter v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API