Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Stone
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided March 16, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.
The plaintiff, S. J. Stone, instituted an action by a notice of motion against Max Rosenberg and others, partners trading as Rosenberg Brothers, to recover damages for the wrongful levy of an attachment of 798 suits of clothes and 100 overcoats. Upon the trial a verdict and judgment for $4,490 was rendered in favor of the plaintiff.
The notice of motion alleged, and evidence for plaintiff tends to establish, that S. J. Stone, who lived in Canton, Ohio, operated a chain of retail clothing stores. Some time in 1930 he purchased the entire stock of clothing owned by Manley’s Clothes Shop, which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- W. B. Moses & Sons v. LockwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924
- McHenry v. City of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
- Crowder v. Virginian Bank of Commerce, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- Stonega Coke & Coal Co v. AddingtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bannon v. KnaussCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Cascades West Assocs. Ltd. Partnership v. PRC, Inc.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 1995
- Select Auto Imports, Inc. v. MinorVirginia Circuit Court · 2002
- Williams v. Virginia Manufactured Housing BoardRockingham County Circuit Court · 2001