Legal Opinion

In re S.M.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2017No. DA 15-0762PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 The State filed a petition to involuntarily commit S.M. after he told a friend he was going to commit suicide. At the initial hearing, S.M. advised the court that he wished to waive counsel and represent himself. The District Court ultimately denied S.M.’s request and appointed counsel over S.M.’s objection. S.M., together with his *29appointed counsel, entered into a stipulation for commitment to community-based treatment. The District Court approved the stipulation and ordered S.M.’s commitment. On appeal, S.M. contends that Montana law prohibiting waiver of the right to counsel violates…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. W. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  2. In re S.D.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. SedlerMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. H. MathisMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  5. In the Matter of M.H.W.Montana Supreme Court · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API