Legal Opinion

Omaha Road Equipment Co. v. Thurston County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1931No. 27825PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.

From an order of the Thurston county board of commissioners disallowing a claim of the Omaha Road Equipment Company, in the sum of $11,838.50, for road machinery alleged to have been furnished and delivered to the county, the plaintiff company appealed to the district court. Upon submission the court found generally in favor of the county and against the company and decreed that the evidence was insufficient to prove that the company had offered to accept a return of the money and equipment and take back the machinery alleged to have been sold to the ■county. The court also found that section…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  3. Brown v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Scott County v. Advance-Rumley Thresher Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  5. International Harvester Co. of America v. Searcy CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. DeVaux v. DeVauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Heese v. WenkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Darnell v. City of Broken BowNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. CAPITAL BRIDGE COMPANY v. County of SaundersNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Moffitt v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API