Legal Opinion

People v. Small

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1905No. Crim. No. 5PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. William P. Law!or, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.

Judgment of imprisonment in the state prison was entered against defendant under an information charging him with having obtained possession of one hundred and three dollars by certain false and fraudulent representations set forth therein. He made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is from the judgment and order denying said motion. His contention is that the verdict is insufficient to sustain the judgment, and hence that he should be discharged.

The information charges the offense defined in section 532 of the Penal Code, which provides: “Every person who knowingly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. TilleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. TerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  2. Kimball v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People v. SachauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. EspostiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. People v. McKinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API