Legal Opinion

Cutler v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 28, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of contract brought by the plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Frederick M. Furber. The declaration is in two counts, the first for the alleged breach of a written contract of employment entered into between the plaintiff’s intestate and the defendant, the second for the recovery of compensation for work and labor alleged to have been performed by the plaintiff at the request of the defendant.

The case was tried before a judge of the Superior Court, without a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts which, in substance, so far as material to the issues to be de*343cided,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Somerby v. BuntinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Drummond v. CraneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Adams v. MessingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Marvel v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Browne v. FairhallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peaseley v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL AND COKE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Rayner v. McCabeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Kowal v. Sportswear by Revere, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Moody v. Town of WeymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Nutting v. KneelandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API