Legal Opinion

Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. Campbell River Mills Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 13, 1931No. 6374PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

The material facts in the instant case are not in dispute and are well stated in the opinion of the District Court, 42 F.(2d) 775, 776. They need not be repeated here in full, but an account of the previous litigation is of particular importance:

“In 1924 the plaintiff made complaint to the Department of Public Works of Washington that it was charged in excess of the local tariff rate. The plaintiff also filed complaint with the Interstate Commerce Com.mission, which tentatively reported that the Interstate Commerce Commission had not jurisdietion. Upon hearing before…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Champlain Realty Co. v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Pennsylvania Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Hughes Brothers Timber Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southern Pac. Co. v. Van HoosearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  2. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  3. Long Beach Banana Distributors, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Globe Grain & Milling Co. v. De Tweede Northwestern & Pacific HypotheekbankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  5. Long Beach Banana Distributors, Inc., a California Corporation v. The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Consolidated Produce Co., a California Corporation v. Pacific Electric Railway Co., Eugene Nella, Sam Cancilla and Diego Cancilla, Dba Banana King, Etc. v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API