Long Beach Banana Distributors, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
In the above-entitled actions, consolidated for trial and appeal, plaintiff banana wholesalers seek the refund of part of the freight charges collected by defendant railroads on the rail movement of bananas wholly within California. The railroads had charged freight rates stated in tariffs filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission, whereas plaintiffs assert that the lower California intrastate rates should have been collected. A summary judgment was entered for defendants and plaintiffs appeal.
The following facts were established by stipulation of the parties. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Sabine Tram Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hegeman Farms Corp. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Penna. R. Co. v. PU Comm'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Munson Steamship LineSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Arnold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Long Beach Banana Distributors, Inc., a California Corporation v. The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Consolidated Produce Co., a California Corporation v. Pacific Electric Railway Co., Eugene Nella, Sam Cancilla and Diego Cancilla, Dba Banana King, Etc. v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969