Legal Opinion

Standard Appliance Co. v. Standard Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1924No. 3896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge,

The plaintiff in error (also plaintiff below) owned a patent covering a compressed air motor. It entered *457into a license contract with the defendant below as licensee. This gave an exclusive license for the 15-year remaining term of the patent, and fixed the license fee per unit. It did not contain any express promise to manufacture or pay royalty upon any fixed number of motors at any time (save by a limited preliminary provision to this effect, which has become immaterial). It did not expressly provide for any forfeiture by the licensee in case of nonmanufacture or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ebert v. LoewensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Midland Linseed Products Co. v. Charles R. Sargent Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. O. B. McClintock Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Thys Co. v. BrulotteWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. American Radiator Co. v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API