Legal Opinion

Midland Linseed Products Co. v. Charles R. Sargent Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1922No. Nos. 3645, 3646PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; D. C. Westenhaver, Judge. Action at law by the Midland Linseed Products Company against the Charles R. Sargent Company. From the judgment, both parties bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.

These two cases were heard and submitted together. The Midland Linseed Products Company brought an action in the District Court against the Charles R. Sargent Company for the recovery of damages for the breach of five separate contracts for the sale and delivery of specified quantities of pure linseed oil, and for a sixth cause of action averred that defendant was indebted to it in the sum of $806.76 upon an account for oil sold and delivered.

The defendant, for answer to plaintiff’s first five causes of action, admitted that it had entered into the contracts described…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Locomotive Co. v. Chemical Research Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  2. Standard Appliance Co. v. Standard Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  3. Louis Stern Sons, Inc. v. Adolf Gobel, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API