Legal Opinion

Bieser v. Stoddard

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 2, 1923No. 10,385PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

1. The parties will be designated as below. The plaintiffs Stoddard and others brought this action in September, 1919, against the defendants Bieser and others for an injunction to restrain them from diverting or using through *556their Willow creek ditch the waters of Willow creek in water district No. 42, Mesa county, Colorado. The plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings was sustained and the injunction decree passed.

The material facts alleged in the complaint, and which, as we shall see, are not put in issue by any of the defenses in the answer, are here summarized. Willow creek is a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Comstock v. RamsaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  2. Platte Valley Irrigation Co. v. Buckers Irrigation, Milling & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  3. Ripley v. Park Center Land & Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. In re German Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  5. Buckers Irrigation, Milling & Improvement Co. v. Farmers' Independent Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Shelton Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. Comrie v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  4. R.J.A., Inc. v. Water Users Ass'n of District No. 6Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Leadville Mine Development Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API