Legal Opinion

Fairlee v. Bloomingdale

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion for a new trial on the judge’s minutes.

1Opinion of the CourtWestbrook, J.

— This cause was tried at the Schoharie circuit in October, 1883. The action was upon a promissory note dated April 1,1876, by which the defendants, who were, at the date of the execution of the note, husband and wife, promised' to- pay “ Elizabeth Fairlee (the plaintiff), or bearer, -two thousand dollars, with interest, for value received.” The note was signed' “ P: Bloomingdale,” “ F. M. Bloomingdale,” and contained no clause charging the separate estate of the wife, who alone defended.

According to .-the testimony of the plaintiff, the consideration of this note was an- old note made by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bertles v. . NunanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Coleman v. . BurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Yale v. . DedererNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Brewster v. . StrikerNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  5. Haas v. ShawIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lowenstein v. SalingerNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Noel v. KinneyNew York City Court · 1885
  3. In re GroveNew York Surrogate's Court · 1888
  4. In re ReuterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1887
  5. Suau v. . CaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API