Legal Opinion

MacKey v. Cleveland State University

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 20, 1993No. 1:91 CV 1430PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BATTISTI, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Plaintiffs response and Defendants’ reply. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is granted with regard to Counts One through Thirteen. Count Fourteen is dismissed with regard to the individual Defendants in their individual capacities. However, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count Fourteen is denied with regard to Cleveland State University and the individual Defendants in their official capacities.

FACTS

The undisputed facts in this case are as follows. Plaintiff, Kevin Mackey (“Mackey”) was employed as…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Safeway Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1994
  2. Bremiller v. Cleveland Psychiatric InstituteDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
  3. Bryant-Bruce v. Vanderbilt University, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1997
  4. Stein v. Kent State University Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
  5. Brkic v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API