Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co. v. Quaker Oats Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The plaintiffs in error claim that the mill owners cannot recover in this action for the following reasons:(1) That the mill owners had no title to the lands conveyed, and hence the grant was without consideration to the plaintiffs in error.(2) That the conveyance in question gave to the traction company only an easement for the purpose of building a railroad and transmission line, and hence the traction company had the right to abandon exercise of the easement at any time, and could thereby escape the obligation of the covenants in the deed.(3) That the money was expended for maintenance of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Peters v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Caldwell v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Slocum v. BracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Hagerty v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
- Mitchell v. McMullenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson Irrigation Co. v. IvoryWyoming Supreme Court · 1933