Friday v. Ethanol Corp.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
One reading the majority opinion would conclude that the majority was going to uphold the constitutionality of the act that requires that persons selling gasohol place a label on the tank to give notice to consumers that the gasoline they are purchasing is enhanced by a minimum of 10% ethyl alcohol. For example, the majority states these correct principles of law in the opinion:
" 'The powers of the government of the State of Alabama shall be divided into three distinct departments, each of which shall be confined to a separate body of magistracy, to wit: Those which are legislative to one;…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Haden v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Eagerton v. Exchange Oil and Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.