Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Sarle
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin S. Meyer, J.
By this special proceeding a union member seeks to inspect the financial records of the union. The proceeding was begun by order to show cause and affidavit. A prior motion under section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act to *316set aside service because of insufficiency of process was denied (23 Misc 2d 334). The present motion attacks the sufficiency of the affidavit (hereafter, as a matter of convenience, referred to as “petition”) to state a cause of action. The motion is granted and the proceeding dismissed.
The petition alleges (1) that examination of the union’s financial books, records and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Solomon v. Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Browne v. HibbetsNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- In re Weidenfeld against KepplerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Weidenfeld v. . KepplerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Caliendo v. McFarlandNew York Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fruit and Vegetable Packers and Warehousemen Local 760, and James Farrington v. Terry C. Morley, Vincent Kuntz and Lumina BrownleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Haiduk v. Atlantic Independent UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Fruit and Vegetable Packers and Warehousemen Local 760, and James Farrington v. Terry C. Morley, Vincent Kuntz and Lumina BrownleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967